Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Peggle Deluxe - XBOX Live Arcade Edition

Some games come along and change your life forever. Be it in a positive or negative light, they still alter your being in some way or another. Peggle Deluxe is one such game. It's the game that got my girlfriend to play my XBOX 360 more often than I do.




And I play my 360 on repeat, to be honest. But there was one of those connections between my girlfriend and Pop Cap Games' addictive little game, originally on the PC, that makes me shake my head in disbelief. I'm the gamer in this relationship. How could she be more addicted to a game than I?

At first glance, the game is a very simple design which ultimately is its most beautiful feature. The main focus of the single-player is the Adventure mode. Here, you'll be introduced to Peggle's cast of characters, each of whom bestows a different magical power for use on his or her level. You'll unlock the power by hitting one of the few green pegs strewn throughout the board. So, for example, while you're playing through Bjorn-the-male-unicorn's level, you'll be able to use the Super Guide power, which shows you where your ball will bounce after its initial impact. When you're going through Splork's levels, you'll be able to use the Space Blast, which just blows away a ton of pegs in a given area. There are considerable differences in how the powers behave, so not only will they add some variety during the Adventure mode, but later in the game you'll be able to pick your favorite power to use on any map, giving you a chance to vary your strategy.

You can easily go through the Adventure Mode in a night, but not necessarily because it's easy. It's more like that book with the killer plot, where you need to keep reading, even though you know sleep is necessary to live. But you tell yourself, "I can sleep for 2 hours this time. I just need to finish a few more levels. I need to hear the chorus of cheer again and see that magical rainbow one more time."

Yeah, I forgot to mention the game has a wicked sense of humor. Little comments come up on the screen, a magical chorus sings when you hit the last orange peg on any given stage, rainbows are being strewn across the screen and the characters themselves are part of the fun. Where else are you going to play as a rabbit with a magic top hat?

To add more gameplay value, when you beat the Adventure mode you can jump right in to the Challenge mode, a series of levels that get more difficult with some additional requirements. These range from the inclusion of more orange pegs, to having to clear the entire board of all the pegs. These challenges add a lot more fun and replay value to an already great game. But I haven't even mentioned playing online!

Multiplayer Peggle has to be the most fun and/or most frustrating part of the game. I've never had a game do that before, and I've played Halo 3. But what do I mean by that? Well, you can play against people in ranked or unranked matches or play locally against someone. The problem comes from other players out there in the land of XBOX Live. I warn you, you will keep on playing, even when someone cuts out mid game because you are schooling them with your unmatched skills. It's happened at least 30 times already and I doubt there's always connection issues. But even with that little nagging fault, it's not the game developers fault that they made a game so simple yet so intense that people feel like it's a 'do or die' situation every time they battle online against someone else.

Would I recommend playing Peggle? Oh, most definitely. It's the best value on the market today and that's coming from someone who loves his arcade games. It's only 800 Microsoft points and I would have spent double that. That's how great the game is. But if you don't believe me, download the trial game. You'll get hooked the moment you start playing those few levels and by the end of it, you'll be entering in your credit card info because you need to know what happens next.



Read More...

Sunday, February 22, 2009

A rant about film from a film fanatic

What happened to the good old days of genre film? Looking through my DVD collection, which has passed the 1500 movie mark, I see tons of titles of films that would never work nowadays, or better yet wouldn't be able to be sold through any of the big film companies or in any of their smaller 'independent' companies either. Films like Coffy, Thriller: A Cruel Picture, Almost Human, Fight For Your Life or Superfly. Films that pushed the envelope every time and sometimes had a bit of social relevance and sometimes they just offended to get ticket sales. But they always held your interest and people were willing to stick around for double and triple features. We see as a whole this can't be done anymore with the common moviegoer. Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez failed with their fun homage to the genre picture Grindhouse. Seeing it at an advanced screening where there were rabid fans of the filmmakers and celebrities like Dee Snider and the like there, it was a great experience, an experience that I envy my father and others had the chance to see back in the 70's and early 80's.

I also envy the film fanatics who live in Los Angeles and Austin, who have great theaters who cater to genre fans by showcasing the best of the best and sometimes the worst of the worst. It's a real experience to watch a film that's got a bad reputation, such as Faces of Death or I Spit on Your Grave with a bunch of friends at home and being shocked, amazed, horrified, hysterical and all these other emotions that a film can bring to people. But it's another feeling all together to have it blown up on the big screen and to watch it with a crowd of well informed movie fans who are there for that particular reason and not some new multiplex movie that has a bunch of brats and mongoloids who can't bear to leave their phone off for 2 hours, let alone for upwards of 4 or 5 hours. Perish the thought to have a film nowadays without one cellphone going off or hearing someone text right next to you. To see the little luminescent atrocities around you, as if you were at a Asia concert and wanting a shotgun to the mouth in the worst way.

Is there anything wrong in what I'm saying? This is an outcry to fans of film in New York City. We need some good theaters again. Sure, there's a few that will play the new independent film or genre picture that you wouldn't be able to see in North Dakota. But I want old films, films that haven't been blown up on the big screen here in NYC since the heyday of the grindhouse cinema. When you were afraid to go to the theaters. When you would sit on god knows what and try to dodge a bum, a hooker and a cop all in the same aisle, all probably doing one another as well.

I want a theater I can go to and see a Monte Hellman film. Or a Russ Meyer film. Imagine one of his films on the big screen? Hoo boy, blows my mind thinking about it. Hell, I'd love to see Plan 9 From Outer Space on a screen somewhere. Anywhere, it doesn't matter. I just want to feel the excitement the film industry used to showcase. Not to say the quality has gotten worse, but there was a method to a good genre film of the 70's. The way they were so awkwardly paced, you'd think it was by accident. Maybe it was, but who cares? I'd rather watch Cotton Comes to Harlem than a film like The Reader any day, and I think if you gave people a chance with more of a selection, you might have a change in the industry.

But what do I know? Madea Goes to Jail just topped this weekend's box office with $42 million of receipts while Coraline has barely made $55 million and it's got a ton of things going for it that other tripe doesn't, such as a stop motion film by Henry Selick from a book written by Neil Gaiman. How could you lose with that combination? And it's in 3-D too, so you're always a winner when it comes to this experience. But sadly it flounders a bit while shit will always rise to the top.

Henceforth I will be attempting to write an article a day detailing my film collection in general. All the DVDs I've bought over the years and if they are worthy for you, the audience, to see. Maybe on the big screen again or if at all, considering some of these films barely made it on any format in general. You might say that I should do something about it. You're right, I should attempt to do something. Which I will in my own little way by having friends over every week for a double feature. One week will be a Charles Bronson theme, the next it might be a little nunsploitation action. I really do have way too many movies to waste on just myself; why not try to give back to the people who need it the most?

If someone rich is reading this and wants to start doing screenings in a bigger venue, let me know. I'm all for it, especially with so many ideas for film in my head, I might be able to throw one of my soon to be made films within a smorgasbord of some old school faves. The ideas are endless too for cool double features. It's actually got me a big excited right now, so I need to see if people are truly down for this idea. A day that everyone is free in some sort of way is going to be tough, but it is doable.

I just want to make film exciting again. I haven't been excited in a movie since The Dark Knight and before that a handful of films touched me in certain ways but never to the point of a nerdgasm. Watchmen will probably be one of those films, but who knows? The people in the theater might annoy the shit out of me. Actually, I kind of know that for a fact because the advertising has been pretty sly to the fact that I've heard people saying, "Yo this film looks like the bomb. It's like Batman on crack, you know?" Which makes me shudder a bit, but then again gives hope to film geeks everywhere that there might be a chance to get some harder to market films out there.

But do we want to cater to the normal film fan? I'm diverting from the original intent of this blog topic, so I'll cut it short and sweet and maybe divulge a bit more on today's film goer. For now I'll leave it at this; going to start a little film revolution of sorts, even if it has to start in my tiny apartment. I mean, if Russell Simmons and Rick Rubin could start Def Jam Records in their dorm room, anything is possible.

-James

Read More...

Sunday, February 15, 2009

So what did I think of the new Friday the 13th?

A better question would be why do you even care? But if you've stumbled onto this blog or are one of my many (i.e. 2) followers, then you are truly interested in my thoughts on the remake/retelling/re-imagining/recycling or whatever they're calling it these days of the Sean Cunningham classic.

But better yet, but what do I think of the series of 10 films (11 if you count Freddy Vs. Jason)? To be honest, I have always liked the character of Jason Voorhees but was never a huge fan of the Friday series. Sacrilegious in some horror circles, I know, but I was always more of a Freddy fan myself (even though that series deserves a write-up, cursing the many sequels except for New Nightmare).


Don't get me wrong, I am a big supporter of stuntmen who get the chance to shine through a ton of prosthetics and get to be the main villain (or hero to some) in these films. Especially Kane Hodder, who took full advantage of this in 4 Friday films (and sadly, 3 of which are almost unwatchable and 1 of which is a true guilty pleasure, especially with the death of David Cronenberg right in the beginning).

But then Freddy Vs. Jason came along and I thought it would be a rebirth of sorts to the Freddy of old. But watching it again this past week, I didn't remember disliking it as much as I did. I think initially, the adrenaline pumping through my horror cortex blocked the bullshit meter throughout my body, therefore showing me a film that was good. The high is gone now and the only redeeming quality of that film is Ken Kirzinger's rendition of Jason. He gave Jason a little bit of sympathy, even when he's slaughtering everyone around him. You feel bad for him because ultimately Freddy Krueger is the bastard. But it really seemed that even Robert Englund, who I love to death, was just phoning in a Freddy performance.

So when the re-imagining (that's what they're calling it) of Friday the 13th was announced, I wasn't pissed about it. I wasn't pissed when I heard Kane Hodder wasn't coming back but a newcomer to the mask, Derek Mears, was announced. When I saw a press photo of him, I was astonished. He looked like a massive brick wall with skin on it. So underneath the bulk of Jason's shabby clothes, if he could mime the attitude of Jason then that's all that needed to be done. They announced a new young group of kids who would be wandering around the woods and therefore be easy prey for Jason's machete (or whatever else he could find. He's a handy guy.) So unlike the remakes of Halloween or even The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, I wasn't as invested in this film's former films being tarnished. If anything, all you could really do with Jason was go up from a pile of shit.

So I got to see an advanced screening the week before it came out, Saturday the 7th to be exact. I didn't want to review it then, considering it would be breaking the embargo they so lovingly have up and also I wanted to give it a second whirl, to make sure it wasn't the same high I had when seeing F vs J. Seeing it again on Friday the 13th, for my friend's birthday in theater 13 itself with a sold out paid crowd of nincompoops who can't shut up and like to hoot and holler throughout it all, what did I think of it after that?

I want to see it a third time. It's that much fun, an experienced slasher flick which might be the dawning of a new era in slasher flicks in general. Is it a good film? Well, that's a tricky subject. Is it good at what it does? It definitely is great at that. It starts off well, showcasing a little homage to the original Mama Voorhees intro then comes to present day and shows a now hulking brute of Potato Sack Jason from number 2 but as opposed to being a stupid retarded redneck who almost fell on his ass throughout that film, this Jason is more methodical. More menacing and with a wicked sense of humor (I want to know if silicone melts and so does Jason. I'll leave it at that). He picks off each camper with ease and with a pot farm I believe is his (what better way to lure idiotic kids the like that killed his dear old mom), it's a matter of time before the actual hero of the story (played by Jared Padalecki of Supernatural fame) comes into play, looking for his sister who was last seen going to Crystal Lake.

Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Well, it's a little throwback to number 4 as well. Besides the 3D effects, this retelling of Jason's origin is a cross between the first 4 films but with an update of course. This time, as producer Brad Fuller has mentioned many times before, there's more sex and boobs. I mean, what kind of slasher flick doesn't have that but re-watching the original films, looking back at them all now they seem much more tame than I remembered. It must mean I'm desensitized from all the horror films I've seen, but that can't be all true though. I still get a bit disheartened by films depicting rape and violence intermixed, such as Last House on the Left and I Spit on Your Grave, both of which I've watched once back to back and felt as uneasy as a fat kid on the top bunk.

This film plays with the dynamics of the slasher flick, throwing some sly curveballs at the viewer to throw them off a bit. Showing a room full of possible weapons in a tool shed is a fun little hint at what might come but when Jason ultimately chooses an ordinary screwdriver (which was attempted to be used on him), it's actually the most horrific death in the movie, which made this gorehound here a happy... well, you get the picture.

Is there one actor in this movie that steals the show? Well, I'd have to give it up to two specific actors that make the movie a memorable experience. One of course would be Derek Mears, who gives Jason a new set of moves, throwing some homages to the old films to keep the fans of the series happy. He emits a lot of anger and thought without uttering a word and seeing a Jason that's 6 foot 5 inches running at full speed at someone is kind of like what Danny Boyle did with the zombie movie in 28 Days Later. He took a once scary monster that was getting a bit stagnant and turned up the velocity and made it frightening again, and that's what the folks at Platinum Dunes did for Jason. I never thought I would say that to be honest, but I love being wrong.

The other actor who makes you hate everything he says and want his comeuppance is Travis Van Winkle's Trent. He's such a loathsome character that you can't believe survives as long as he does, but it all makes sense if you've watched as many slasher flicks as I have. The asshole tends to live a long time, basically throwing other good people in the way of the killer to make sure they last just a bit longer. So when he finally gets his, the crowd cheers even though when you sit back and think about it, does he deserve to actually die? In slasher film rules, yes he does. He deserves to die a terrible death. So watch out for him playing a ton of assholes in the years to come (he was also Megan Fox's boyfriend in Transformers, where again he played a sexist creep who you just want to see his nose get broken in 3 spots).

This film won't win any Academy Awards or be liked by the big film reviewers of newspapers and the like, and I'm glad. I haven't followed any film reviewer like that in years. It's a dying breed and the only reason they are still around is because the big film companies love to pay them to give them beautiful blurbs on their movies posters and DVD boxes. The Joel Siegel's, the Gene Shalit's, the Jeffrey Lyon's... and yes, I know Joel Siegel is dead, and I'm quite surprised they haven't rehashed some of his grand commentary on film theory on newer flicks. Nobody would probably notice anyway. Zombie Joel Siegel on the other hand... now there's a thought.

And looking at the box office numbers, it appears to be that Jason is back on top, taking $42.2 million in its first weekend. That a hell of a number, considering the budget was under $20 million. So it's already a profitable film, which means sequel will be announced this week. I actually want to see what they will put Jason through the next one and I'm happy he's not zombie Jason or mystical Jason of later years. Keep him as a living entity, a backwoods boogeyman of sorts that stalks down stupid kids who do stupid things. We're not talking rocket science. Keep them simple, make the kills fun and the victims good looking people and stupid as hell and people will keep coming back. But the deciding factor is Jason and who's behind the mask. Let's keep Derek Mears there. Not only was he the perfect Jason for the new era but he's also a hell of a nice guy with a very strong handshake.

So I'll give the film a See It grade. It's fun, there's some good kills and you actually care about a few of the kids, something I'm not used to. But sadly there's no Crispin Glover type dancing. If there was, this film would be perfect

Coming this week, some more Netflixorama entries. Hopefully I can get back on board and do them as often as I'd like.

Read More...

The Maw - XBOX Live Arcade Review


Do you remember the iconic game A Boy and His Blob from the NES? I used to play that game over and over again. Throwing my blob different colored/flavored jellybeans in order to change him into something entirely different was just something that spoke to me when I was 10 years old. What does this have to do with Twisted Pixel's new game The Maw. Well, you are an alien boy who has this kind of blobby dog alien who has an insatiable appetite.


What do you get when you cross aliens, a mysterious galactic force out collecting those aliens, and a bottomless pit in the shape of a blob? You get developer Twisted-Pixel’s hilarious new take on the platforming genre, “Maw”, which hit XBLA shelves on January 21st.

Equipped with only a leash gun, you play as the title’s protagonist Frank; an alien who befriends and controls the real star of the game, Maw, by “leading” him around the levels of the game in order to get him to grow and gain new abilities which allow you to solve the level’s puzzles and continue on through the game. Maw starts out as a tiny pink blob on your screen who is only able to eat the tiny puffball creatures that inhabit the first (and most of the subsequent) planets in the game. As he eats more his size increases and he is able to eat the larger and fiercer creatures that play an integral part of the game. Being able to eat these larger creatures becomes important because as your blobular friend eats certain animals he inherits the abilities that each of these creatures possesses; these abilities become necessary to solve the puzzles that Frank and Maw encounter as they progress through the game’s straightforward level designs.

Though the difficulty has been turned down, controlling Maw can become slightly annoying at times with no true way to get him to go where you would like (all he does is follow you and hopefully he’ll get the hint and do what you were planning for him to do), and the storyline itself is quite bland and mostly non-existent the experience itself is there and will push players forward to finish it. This game is a colorful and light-hearted take on the platformer genre that will have experienced players chuckling at the antics of Maw and newcomers to gaming receiving a good introduction on how a game should be played and especially the definition of what a quality game actually is.

On January 21st The Maw was available on the Xbox 360’s Live Arcade System for 800 points ($10) and is well worth the price tag for anyone who thought that platforming was becoming a bit stale, for parents looking to get their children a light-hearted, kid-friendly game, or for achievement hunters (as most of the game’s 200-point achievements can be received through a weekend of casual playing or a day’s play-through).

Twisted Pixel has also recently announced that Maw will be getting three additional levels in the coming months for the small price of 100 MS points a piece. Each of these levels are supposedly going to flesh out a little bit more of the story and will play as “Deleted Scenes” from the game as well as coming equipped with an additional achievement for each. No specific dates have been given but Twisted Pixel did say that these would be three separate releases from one another.

So as you can see, a fun game overall for the most casual gamer around. Being a bit more of a hardcore gamer myself, I appreciated the fact that they made a very funny and very colorful game that you don't have to take too seriously while playing it. I'll be honest, I haven't felt angry yet while playing it. This game should be given to prisoners to play with in order to rehabilitate them. Yes, government, you can have that suggestion for free.

Read More...